Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
I kinda like it [listing the commands git-gc calls], and it might be
helpful if someone's got a large repo and one part of gc for some reason
didn't complete so they want to start at whatever step it broke off on.
Let me clarify: I do not like the listing in the man page. This suggests
to the user to delve into plumbing areas where it is all too easy to shoot
yourself in the foot.
I misunderstood.
I have nothing against listing the commands per se. But the man page is
too exposed IMHO. (Or would you like to add the original shell script to
git-log's man page, too?)
My preferred location would be somewhere near Documentation/technical/, so
that people reading the commands are more likely to understand the
consequences.
But maybe I'm wrong.
Having read the reasoning, I confess myself convinced. Thanks for clarifying.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
