On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 9:00 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Re [1] maybe this is ok/fine for now, but I think we should really split > out the "is specific to file" part more narrowly (not just here, but in > general). > > E.g. I assume that "pack-refs" is simply redundant under reftable, no? I've expanded on the commit message to clarify this. > Should the current behavior documented in > Documentation/git-maintenance.txt change with your series under reftable > etc? No, not for now. Once the reftable support is landed, we could update the docs to not talk about loose vs packed refs, but that seems premature at the moment. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays. -- Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
