Re: [PATCH] refs: print errno for read_raw_ref if GIT_TRACE_REFS is set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:08 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> >> I do wonder if we want strerror(errno) instead of the number, but I
> >> can go either way (it's just a trace output).
> >
> > For tracing, it would be most useful if we got the actual symbol (eg.
> > ENOENT). Is there a way to get at that?
>
> I do not think there is.
>
> And that is the reason why we see everywhere calls to die_errno(),
> error(..., strerror(errno)), etc.
>
> As this is interpolated into trace with untranslated string,
> I suspect that strerror() is not a good match, so let's live with %d
> for now.

Great!

This topic is marked as

Waiting for reviews to conclude.
cf. <xmqq4kgbb2ic.fsf@gitster.g>

but I don't know what is left to do. Oversight?

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich
I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays.
--
Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux