Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Trygve Aaberge reported the current git bisect breakage on [1]. > After starting bisection with --term-new and --term-old arguments to git > bisect start, skipping with git bisect skip does not change HEAD as > expected. > > Let's add the test to catch this breakage. I expected, as you said in your first version, that it would be added as part of an existing test script for "git bisect". And I suspect that you can reuse the history the existing tests in the script already use, so you won't have to add the first "initialize" piece. If the tested sequence should work but does not yet work due to lack of a fix to a known bug, the test should be marked as test_expect_failure instead of test_expect_success. > * style changes requested by Junio Heh, I didn't request anything. I merely pointed out the parts that violate the style guide, so if anything, the guide requested you and I was just a messenger ;-). Thanks.
