On 2021-04-20 at 13:52:33, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > This has a textual conflict (no longer a semantic one) with the above > ab/unexpected-object-type etc. > > As noted in > https://lore.kernel.org/git/87mttx121j.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ I had > questions about the approach in hash-object.c, in particular I have > POC/WIP patches that make one of brian's TODO tests pass, by doing the > "we are in SHA256 mode" earlier, which is also less code as we won't > need to add special handling to a large part of hash-object.c (or, in > the future, other such commands). I'm going to drop those first two patches for now, since I plan to implement them in a different way in the future. -- brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them) Houston, Texas, US
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
