On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 03:18:47PM CEST, Benjamin Collins wrote:
> On 8/29/07, Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > But overally, I'm still not convinced that there is a feasible use-case
> > for the cloned hooks at all. Someone has a particular example?
> >
> > --
> > Petr "Pasky" Baudis
>
> My group at work would like this capability. We have a homogeneous
> environment with well-known NFS shares, and some scripts that do
> things in this common environment (e.g., release scripts). It would
> be nice if when we do a clone, all the hook scripts (that would be
> valid on any machine, in any directory, for any user) would come with
> it.
Unfortunately, you didn't really describe a use-case, you just said that
you would like them - not what you would use them to. The thing is, so
far almost all the use cases would be better off with either using the
hooks only at the central repository hub and keeping the developers'
freedom locally, or would work better simply somewhere else than in hook
files. I'm not saying that this must be the case every time, that is why
I'm asking for more input data.
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Early to rise and early to bed makes a male healthy and wealthy and dead.
-- James Thurber
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
