Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> Furthermore, the filter also allows future iterations which build on top >> of this. If we had a combined OR filter in addition to the existing >> combined AND filter, the user could say "Give me all blobs which aren't >> bigger than a specific size PLUS all trees with a depth smaller than 5 >> PLUS all commits and tags". It's not like I'd know of a specific usecase >> for this right now, but I think the potential of having such filters in >> the future is a plus. > > Yeah, that's true. My biggest complaint is lack of an OR filter, but we > could add that later. And then we would be _more_ flexible, as you note, > since we could and/or more filters. > > So I'm OK proceeding with this direction. I think the only remaining issues are the comments on 5/8 on tests, then? Hopefully we can have one more iteration to finalize the topic and merge it down to 'next'? Thanks.
