On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 3:14 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'd think that rather than duplicating magic constants & one thing in > dir.h we'd be better off having some leading patches splitting off the > relevant parts of object-file.c & dir.h, maybe THAT_NAME_minimal.h? > > Or: why not simply include dir.h and object.h etc? The compiler/linker > will discard the unused functions, and if the worry is overuse of > git.git functions creeping in I'd think that would be better done via > some test/CI job that checks what objects were used. It was useful to see how much (or how little) of Git I needed to make it work, but it has served its purpose, so I followed your suggestion to use dir.h and object.h. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays. -- Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
