Re: [PATCH 0/3] low-hanging performance fruit with promisor packs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

>
> I didn't explore any of those here, and I don't plan to look into them
> anytime soon. I'm just documenting my findings for later.
>
> Anyway, here are the patches.
>
>   [1/3]: is_promisor_object(): free tree buffer after parsing
>   [2/3]: lookup_unknown_object(): take a repository argument
>   [3/3]: revision: avoid parsing with --exclude-promisor-objects
>
>  builtin/fsck.c                   |  2 +-
>  builtin/pack-objects.c           |  2 +-
>  http-push.c                      |  2 +-
>  object.c                         |  7 +++----
>  object.h                         |  2 +-
>  packfile.c                       |  1 +
>  refs.c                           |  2 +-
>  revision.c                       |  2 +-
>  t/helper/test-example-decorate.c |  6 +++---
>  t/perf/p5600-partial-clone.sh    | 12 ++++++++++++
>  upload-pack.c                    |  2 +-
>  walker.c                         |  2 +-
>  12 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> -Peff

I took look on this series and tested as well, together with the
fix for the "unpacking and deleting" promisor objects situation.

It looks good to me.

-- 
Thanks
Rafael



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux