Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > In reply to [1] because they're related post-GETTEXT_POISON cleanup, > but both apply on top of master. > > I had a flaky t4013 test with some local WIP code that I hadn't > investigated, as it turns out re-running the test was hiding the > failure. 2/2 fixes that, 1/2 is a minor post-GETTEXT_POISON cleanup. I feel somewhat offended to see t4013's "auto preparation of the expected output" feature (which of course I invented) as "flakey" ;-) but I agree that was a misfeature. Thanks for taking a look.
