On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:58 PM Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:45 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > @@ -251,7 +252,9 @@ static int debug_read_raw_ref(struct ref_store *ref_store, const char *refname,
> > > trace_printf_key(&trace_refs, "read_raw_ref: %s: %s (=> %s) type %x: %d\n",
> > > refname, oid_to_hex(oid), referent->buf, *type, res);
> > > } else {
> > > - trace_printf_key(&trace_refs, "read_raw_ref: %s: %d\n", refname, res);
> > > + trace_printf_key(&trace_refs,
> > > + "read_raw_ref: %s: %d (errno %d)\n", refname,
> > > + res, errno);
> > > }
> >
> > OK. Between trace_printf_key() and the return of the call to
> > read_raw_ref() method of the ref backend is only an "if (res == 0)"
> > condition and I do not see anything that might clobber errno.
>
> I don't want to bet on that. Let me send a second round.
oh, ugh. In email, there are two calls, but one is prefixed with '-'.
Nevertheless, a bit of paranoia doesn't hurt here.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich
I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays.
--
Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
