Re: [PATCH 3/5] refspec: output a refspec item

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> But yes, it seems even more straightforward to do away with passing the
> refspec at all to "git fetch", and instead pass some (maybe internal
> only, and documented as such) "--refspec-dst-prefix=refs/prefetch/"
> option to "git fetch".
>
> I.e. get_ref_map() over there is already doing a version of this loop
> over "remote->fetch.nr".
>
> So instead of "git gc" doing the loop, then passing all the refspecs on
> the command-line, it could tell "git fetch" to do the same munging when
> it does the same iteration.

That direction makes quite a lot of sense to me.

> Doing the munging in builtin/gc.c's fetch_remote() just seems like a
> relic from when we didn't care what decision builtin/fetch.c made about
> refspecs, we always wanted our custom one.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux