Re: Reviewed-by given by celebrities (no subject matter expertise on Git development)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 01:57:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > I don't usually post "me too" responses, since they are usually just
> > noise. But I could not resist it here, for two reasons:
> >
> >   - this is such a nicely written summary of what "Reviewed-by" means in
> >     our project that I think it deserves some praise. :)
> >
> >   - because it is ultimately about "what does Reviewed-by mean within
> >     the Git project", there is some small value in having another
> >     project member say "yes, that is exactly what I expect from it,
> >     too"
> 
> Heh, thanks.
> 
> Are you hinting that some of what I wrote (with typofixes like
> s/arond/around/) should be inserted to SubmittingPatches or
> somewhere near it?

I would not be opposed to that, but I also do not want to create more
work for you. :)

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux