Re: [PATCH 4/5] test-tool: test refspec input/output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/5/2021 1:52 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 9:04 AM Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
> <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Add a new test-helper, 'test-tool refspec', that currently reads stdin
>> line-by-line and translates the refspecs using the parsing logic of
>> refspec_item_init() and writes them to output.
>> [...]
>> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/t/helper/test-refspec.c b/t/helper/test-refspec.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
>> +int cmd__refspec(int argc, const char **argv)
>> +{
>> +       struct strbuf line = STRBUF_INIT;
>> +       [...]
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
> 
> Leaking `strbuf line` here. Yes, I realize that the function is
> returning and test-tool exiting immediately after this, so not a big
> deal, but it's easy to do this correctly by releasing the strbuf, thus
> setting good precedence for people who might use this as a template
> for new test-tool functions they add in the future.
> 
>> diff --git a/t/t5511-refspec.sh b/t/t5511-refspec.sh
>> @@ -93,4 +93,45 @@ test_refspec fetch "refs/heads/${good}"
>> +test_expect_success 'test input/output round trip' '
>> +       cat >input <<-\EOF &&
>> +               +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
>> +               refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
>> +               refs/heads/main:refs/remotes/frotz/xyzzy
>> +               :refs/remotes/frotz/deleteme
>> +               ^refs/heads/secrets
>> +               refs/heads/secret:refs/heads/translated
>> +               refs/heads/secret:heads/translated
>> +               refs/heads/secret:remotes/translated
>> +               secret:translated
>> +               refs/heads/*:remotes/xxy/*
>> +               refs/heads*/for-linus:refs/remotes/mine/*
>> +               2e36527f23b7f6ae15e6f21ac3b08bf3fed6ee48:refs/heads/fixed
>> +               HEAD
>> +               @
>> +               :
>> +       EOF
> 
> Over-indented heredoc body. It is customary[1] in this codebase for
> the body and EOF to have the same indentation as the command which
> starts the heredoc.

Good catches. Thanks!
-Stolee



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux