ZheNing Hu <adlternative@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> By the way it might be better to first have a patch that clarifies the >> existing documentation of ".command", before the patch that adds >> ".cmd". This way the first patch that only clarifies the documentation >> could be backported to maintenance branches of old releases. > > This first patch should explain errors of ".command", and then explain that > we will no longer use it, right? If I am reading what Christian wrote correctly, I think it is not "errors of .command" but to clarify the misleading description (especially around the "as if <token>=<value> were added at the beginning"). As if nothing is planned for its deprecation.
