On 03/04/21 02.22, gh acct via GitGitGadget wrote:
From: ghacct <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Is it anonymous contribution?
Dear git community,
Is it possible please for the gitk selection color setting to be persistent? Since 2015 this has been working for me.
Thank you for considering!
The patch/commit message seems like question asking for something,
but you should instead describe why you made this patch, as our
convention here.
Signed-off-by: tgomez <tgomez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: ghacct <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I asked to you: Is tgomez co-authored this patch or just helping?
---
gitk: fix selection color not persistent
Dear git community, Is it possible please for the gitk selection color
setting to be persistent? Since 2015 this has been working for me. Thank
you for considering!
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-926%2Fghacct%2Fpatch-1-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-926/ghacct/patch-1-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/926
gitk-git/gitk | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/gitk-git/gitk b/gitk-git/gitk
index 23d9dd1fe0d0..d255654b02fd 100755
--- a/gitk-git/gitk
+++ b/gitk-git/gitk
@@ -2412,6 +2412,7 @@ proc makewindow {} {
text $ctext -background $bgcolor -foreground $fgcolor \
-state disabled -undo 0 -font textfont \
-yscrollcommand scrolltext -wrap none \
+ -selectbackground $selectbgcolor -selectforeground $fgcolor \
-xscrollcommand ".bleft.bottom.sbhorizontal set"
if {$have_tk85} {
$ctext conf -tabstyle wordprocessor
base-commit: a65ce7f831aa5fcc596c6d23fcde543d98b39bd7
[CC] Junio, what do you think about this patch?
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara