Re: Detecting when bulk file-system operations complete

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Drew,

On 31/03/2021 04:39, Drew Noakes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I develop IDE tooling that watches a repo's workspace and reacts to changes.
>
> Bulk file-system changes (i.e. branch switch, rebase, merge,
> cherry-pick) trigger lots of file system events, and my tooling should
> ignore intermediary updates. Currently I debounce events with a fixed
> time span, but would like a more reliable and performant approach to
> scheduling this reactive work.
>
> Can this be done by monitoring the GITDIR in some way? For example, is
> there a file that's present when these operations are in flight, and
> which is removed when they complete?
>
> If an operation is interrupted (i.e. merge or rebase that hits a
> conflict) my tooling should consider the bulk operation as complete.
> This means that detecting a git-rebase-todo file or
> rebase-merge/rebase-apply folder is not adequate.
>
> Any help appreciated. Thanks!
>
> Drew.
You may want to look at the various bits of work on `fsmonitor` etc on
the mailing list archive

https://lore.kernel.org/git/?q=fsmonitor

to ensure that all the different approaches inter-operate with
reasonable efficiency..

-- 
Philip



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux