Am 29.03.21 um 12:18 schrieb Phillip Wood: > It would be nice to include indented define forms but including them > means that any change to the body of a function is attributed to the > last internal definition rather than the actual function. For example > > (define (f arg) > (define (g x) > (+ 1 x)) > > (some-func ...) > ;;any change here will have '(define (g x)' in the hunk header, not > '(define (f arg)' > > I don't think this can be avoided as we rely on regexs rather than > parsing the source so it is probably best to only match toplevel defines. There can be two rules, one that matches '(define-' that is indented, and another one that matches all non-indented forms of definitions. If that is what you mean. -- Hannes
