Re: [PATCH] name-rev: Fix non-shortest description

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Jeff King wrote:

> +#define MAX_GENERATIONS 32

This is exactly what I tried to avoid, and why I did _not_ do the 
"correct" fix.  In some real-life (i.e. non-OpenSource) repositories you 
do get a mess, and you do get quite a lot of messy merges.  So I am not at 
all convinced that this holds together in such setups.

Besides, name-rev is already a memory hog.  Your patch makes it worse.

IOW I think that my patch is a good trade off between correct and working.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux