[PATCH v3 1/2] pathspec: warn for a no-glob entry that contains `**`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If a pathspec given that contains `**`, chances are that someone is
naively expecting that it will do what the manual has told him
(i.e. that `**` will match 0-or-more directories).

When `**` appears in the pathspec, the user may be expecting that
it would be matched using the "wildmatch" semantics,
matching 0 or more directories.
That is not what happens without ":(glob)" magic.

Teach the pathspec parser to emit an advice message when a substring
`**` appears in a pathspec element that does not have a `:(glob)` magic.
Make sure we don't disturb users who use ":(literal)" magic
with such a substring, as it is clear they want to find these strings literally.

Signed-off-by: Stavros Ntentos <133706+stdedos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 pathspec.c                 | 13 +++++++++++++
 pathspec.h                 |  1 +
 t/t6130-pathspec-noglob.sh | 13 +++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/pathspec.c b/pathspec.c
index 7a229d8d22..d5b9c0d792 100644
--- a/pathspec.c
+++ b/pathspec.c
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+#include <string.h>
 #include "cache.h"
 #include "config.h"
 #include "dir.h"
@@ -588,6 +589,8 @@ void parse_pathspec(struct pathspec *pathspec,
 
 		init_pathspec_item(item + i, flags, prefix, prefixlen, entry);
 
+		check_missing_glob(entry, item[i].magic);
+
 		if (item[i].magic & PATHSPEC_EXCLUDE)
 			nr_exclude++;
 		if (item[i].magic & magic_mask)
@@ -739,3 +742,13 @@ int match_pathspec_attrs(const struct index_state *istate,
 
 	return 1;
 }
+
+void check_missing_glob(const char *pathspec_entry, int flags) {
+	if (flags & (PATHSPEC_GLOB | PATHSPEC_LITERAL)) {
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (strstr(pathspec_entry, "**")) {
+		warning(_("Pathspec provided contains `**`, but no :(glob) magic.\nIt will not match 0 or more directories!"));
+	}
+}
diff --git a/pathspec.h b/pathspec.h
index 454ce364fa..913518ebd3 100644
--- a/pathspec.h
+++ b/pathspec.h
@@ -157,5 +157,6 @@ char *find_pathspecs_matching_against_index(const struct pathspec *pathspec,
 int match_pathspec_attrs(const struct index_state *istate,
 			 const char *name, int namelen,
 			 const struct pathspec_item *item);
+void check_missing_glob(const char* pathspec_entry, int flags);
 
 #endif /* PATHSPEC_H */
diff --git a/t/t6130-pathspec-noglob.sh b/t/t6130-pathspec-noglob.sh
index ba7902c9cd..af6cd16f76 100755
--- a/t/t6130-pathspec-noglob.sh
+++ b/t/t6130-pathspec-noglob.sh
@@ -157,4 +157,17 @@ test_expect_success '**/ does not work with :(literal) and --glob-pathspecs' '
 	test_must_be_empty actual
 '
 
+cat > expected <<"EOF"
+warning: Pathspec provided contains `**`, but no :(glob) magic.
+EOF
+test_expect_success '** without :(glob) warns of lacking glob magic' '
+	test_might_fail git stash -- "**/bar" 2>warns &&
+	grep -Ff expected warns
+'
+
+test_expect_success '** with :(literal) does not warn of lacking glob magic' '
+	test_might_fail git stash -- ":(literal)**/bar" 2>warns &&
+	! grep -Ff expected warns
+'
+
 test_done
-- 
2.31.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux