Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pathspec: warn for a no-glob entry that contains `**`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stavros Ntentos <stdedos@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Ofc, if someone really wanted to solve this, someone
> could rework the `void vreportf` split and auto-pad
> prefix at newline, but sounds like a project on its own ...

But when it happens, this extra "\t" would get in the way
and needs to be adjusted ;-)

It has been on the radar for quite some time to apply the same
principle for die(), error(), and warning() as how advise()
shows its "hint:" prefix.

The format strings given to these functions are end-user-facing and
subject to localization, so there is no huge compatibility issues we
need to be worried about.

The test suite have fixed expectations and such a change must be
accompanied by adjustment to the affected tests, though.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux