On Wed, Mar 24 2021, Emily Shaffer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 09:33:46AM +0100, �var Arnfj�r� Bjarmason wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 11 2021, Emily Shaffer wrote:
>>
>> > + switch (should_run_hookdir) {
>> > + case HOOKDIR_NO:
>>
>> Style: case shouldn't be indented
>
> Done, thanks.
>
>>
>> > + strbuf_addstr(&hookdir_annotation, _(" (will not run)"));
>> > + break;
>> > + case HOOKDIR_ERROR:
>> > + strbuf_addstr(&hookdir_annotation, _(" (will error and not run)"));
>> > + break;
>> > + case HOOKDIR_INTERACTIVE:
>> > + strbuf_addstr(&hookdir_annotation, _(" (will prompt)"));
>> > + break;
>> > + case HOOKDIR_WARN:
>> > + strbuf_addstr(&hookdir_annotation, _(" (will warn but run)"));
>> > + break;
>> > + case HOOKDIR_YES:
>> > + /*
>> > + * The default behavior should agree with
>> > + * hook.c:configured_hookdir_opt(). HOOKDIR_UNKNOWN should just
>> > + * do the default behavior.
>> > + */
>> > + case HOOKDIR_UNKNOWN:
>> > + default:
>> > + break;
>>
>> We should avoid this sort of translation lego.
>>
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > list_for_each(pos, head) {
>> > struct hook *item = list_entry(pos, struct hook, list);
>> > item = list_entry(pos, struct hook, list);
>> > if (item) {
>> > /* Don't translate 'hookdir' - it matches the config */
>> > - printf("%s: %s\n",
>> > + printf("%s: %s%s\n",
>>
>> native speakers in some languages to read the sentance backwards.
>> Because if you concatenate strings like this you force.
>>
>> (We don't currently have a RTL language in po/, still, but let's not
>> create churn for if/when we do if we can help it)>
>
> Yeah, you are absolutely right. I'll take a look at your suggestion,
> thanks.
>
>>
>>
>> I have a patch on top to fix this, will send it as some general reply of
>> proposed fixup.s
>
> FWIW, I found this format of suggestions really hard to navigate. I had
> to go find your fixup (and I think you sent two different ones) and then
> had to scroll around and find what you're referring to from here. If I
> were to apply the fixup directly, I'd have to split it up and find the
> appropriate commits to associate each part of the diff with. I know
> generating scissors patches for each review is a pain, but I'd even
> prefer a prose "How about printing in each part of the case instead, so
> each string can be translated in full" or a non-formatted example inline
> to the catchall fixups patch you sent.
Sorry about that. FWIW I did try, but found myself jumping a bit too
much between different commits (as noted in some "maybe squash?"
comments elsewhere), and eventually just gave up and produced some
RFC-just-for-discussion patch on top of the whole thing and mostly
looked at the entire diff forthe series.
>>
>> > (item->from_hookdir
>> > + git hook list pre-commit >actual &&
>> > + # the hookdir annotation is translated
>> > + test_i18ncmp expected actual
>>
>> This (and the rest of test_i18ncmp in this series) can and should just
>> be "test_cmp" or "test_i18ncmp", the poison mode is dead. See my recent
>> patches to search/replace test_i18ncmp.
>>
>> The reason the function isn't gone entirely was to help a series like
>> yours in "seen", but if we're re-rolling...
>
> Oh cool, thanks, will do.
