On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 07:05:12PM +0100, René Scharfe. wrote: > Am 22.03.21 um 13:11 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason: > > Change the "xargs -n X" limit for running spatch from 1 to 8, as > > suggested by Jeff King[1]. Now that we're not using --all-includes > > anymore this is going to take much less memory, so bumping the limit > > should be OK. > > But --all-includes is still used, so does this patch still make sense? I got similar results on the state before this series (using just --all-includes). So presumably it holds up. I'm not at all convinced, though, that this isn't simply unique to my system, or to a version of spatch. -Peff
