Re: [PATCH v8] format-patch: allow a non-integral version numbers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 01:54:15AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 1:45 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > To protect against that problem, you may need to call
> > > format_sanitized_subject() manually after formatting "v%s-". (I'm just
> > > looking at this code for the first time, so I could be hopelessly
> > > wrong. There may be a better way to fix it.)
> >
> > Yes, slash is of course very problematic, but what we've been doing
> > to the patch filenames was to ensure that they will be free of $IFS
> > whitespaces and shell glob special characters as well, and we should
> > treat the "reroll count" just like the other end-user controlled
> > input, i.e. the title of the patch, and sanitize it the same way.
> >
> > So I am pretty sure format_sanitized_subject() is the right way to
> > go.
> 
> The pathname sanitization would also deserve a test.
> 
> Denton's seemingly simple feature request[1] has turned out to be
> quite a little project.

Sorry I've been quite busy the past couple of weeks so I haven't had the
bandwidth to review the patches as they've come up. Thanks for
implementing my feature request, ZheNing. And thanks for the careful
reviews, Eric.

> [1]: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/issues/882



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux