Re: git-svn tags and branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sam Vilain <sam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> In that case, I think that an annotated tag would be a better
> conversion.  It just really needs a good test case drawn up, and
> then be implemented.  For those 0.01% of tags that do change from
> the version they were copied from, they must remain as branches.

"remain"?  Things don't need to stay the same.  Most (but not
necessarily all) Subversion tags presumably start out as "tags", top
level trunk copies, and then "just a final fix" gets in at some point
of time.  Of course, one can also "tag" off branches, or of
subdirectories or whatever in Subversion.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux