Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] Makefile/coccicheck: add comment heading for all SPATCH flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 22.03.21 um 13:11 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason:
> In 960154b9c17 (coccicheck: optionally batch spatch invocations,
> 2019-05-06) the comment being re-added here was amended and reworded
> to apply to the SPATCH_BATCH_SIZE variable.
>
> If we'd like a separate comment on SPATCH_FLAGS now the diff to
> introduce it will need to also move the comment.

None of the patches in this series do actually add a separate comment.
So SPATCH_FLAGS could stay where it is, no?

> So add this heading
> back to make subsequent diffs smaller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Makefile | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index f3dc2178324..eef99b4705d 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -1198,10 +1198,11 @@ PTHREAD_CFLAGS =
>  SPARSE_FLAGS ?=
>  SP_EXTRA_FLAGS = -Wno-universal-initializer
>
> +# For the 'coccicheck' target
> +SPATCH_FLAGS = --all-includes --patch .
>  # For the 'coccicheck' target; setting SPATCH_BATCH_SIZE higher will
>  # usually result in less CPU usage at the cost of higher peak memory.
>  # Setting it to 0 will feed all files in a single spatch invocation.
> -SPATCH_FLAGS = --all-includes --patch .
>  SPATCH_BATCH_SIZE = 1
>
>  include config.mak.uname
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux