"Nils Leif Fischer via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Nils Leif Fischer <nils.fischer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Nils Leif Fischer <nils.fischer@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Fix typo in git-maintenance documentation > > Just a small typo. This is from the very beginning at 2057d750 (maintenance: create basic maintenance runner, 2020-09-17), I think. > Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-984%2Fnilsleiffischer%2Fnilsleiffischer-patch-1-v1 > Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-984/nilsleiffischer/nilsleiffischer-patch-1-v1 > Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/984 > > Documentation/git-maintenance.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-maintenance.txt b/Documentation/git-maintenance.txt > index 80ddd33ceba0..8023504dc65d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-maintenance.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-maintenance.txt > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ any object transfer. > > gc:: > Clean up unnecessary files and optimize the local repository. "GC" > - stands for "garbage collection," but this task performs many > + stands for "garbage collection", but this task performs many Isn't this merely an American style vs British style issue? > smaller tasks. This task can be expensive for large repositories, > as it repacks all Git objects into a single pack-file. It can also > be disruptive in some situations, as it deletes stale data. See > > base-commit: a5828ae6b52137b913b978e16cd2334482eb4c1f cf. https://www.grammarly.com/blog/quotation-marks https://www.thepunctuationguide.com/british-versus-american-style.html https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/punctuation/quotation_marks/more_quotation_mark_rules.html
