Hi, Eli Schwartz wrote: > I'm not especially attached to the proposal. I'm a maintainer for one > of these package managers that currently special-case git+https?:// and > rewrite the url that git sees, which has worked adequately for a long > time. This is useful context. What URL forms does this package manager support (e.g., do you have a link to its documentation)? What would the effect be for the package manager and its users if Git started supporting a git+https:// synonym for https://? Thanks, Jonathan
