Re: Distinguishing FF vs non-FF updates in the reflog?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, March 17, 2021 9:06:06 PM MDT Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> I'm working on some extensions to Gerrit for which it would be very
> beneficial if we could tell from the reflog if an update is a
> fast-forward or not: if we find a SHA1 in the reflog, and see there
> were only FF updates since, we can be sure that the SHA1 is reachable
> from the branch, without having to open packfiles and decode commits.

I don't think this would be reliable.

1) Not all updates make it to the reflogs
2) Reflogs can be edited or mucked with
3) On NFS reflogs can outright be wrong even when used properly as their are 
caching issues. We specifically have seen entries that appear to be FFs that 
were not.

I believe that today git can do very fast reachability checks without opening 
pack files by using some of its indexes (bitmap code or https://git-scm.com/
docs/commit-graph ?). It probably makes sense to add this ability to jgit if 
that is what you need?

-Martin 

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code 
Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux