Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Move the FSCK_{FATAL,INFO,ERROR,WARN,IGNORE} defines into a new
> fsck_msg_type enum.
Nice.
> Untangling that would take some more work, since we expose the new
> "enum fsck_msg_type" to both. Similar to "enum object_type" it's not
> worth structuring the API in such a way that only those who need
> FSCK_{ERROR,WARN} pass around a different type.
