Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Move the FSCK_{FATAL,INFO,ERROR,WARN,IGNORE} defines into a new > fsck_msg_type enum. Nice. > Untangling that would take some more work, since we expose the new > "enum fsck_msg_type" to both. Similar to "enum object_type" it's not > worth structuring the API in such a way that only those who need > FSCK_{ERROR,WARN} pass around a different type.