On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 7:13 PM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
<avarab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As with the previous round, why do you have the subject as "tree-walk:
..." instead of "match-trees: ..." ?
>
> Refactor code added in 85e51b783c3 (Make "subtree" part more
> orthogonal to the rest of merge-recursive., 2008-06-30) to make it
> obvious that we don't care about the "mode" here outside of the if
> statement it appears in.
>
> That's opposed to the sub1 & sub2 variables, where we use the two
> object ids later in this function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> match-trees.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/match-trees.c b/match-trees.c
> index 0faacd8f4ae..e84f993a460 100644
> --- a/match-trees.c
> +++ b/match-trees.c
> @@ -317,17 +317,17 @@ void shift_tree_by(struct repository *r,
> const char *shift_prefix)
> {
> struct object_id sub1, sub2;
> - unsigned short mode1, mode2;
> + unsigned short tmp;
> unsigned candidate = 0;
>
> /* Can hash2 be a tree at shift_prefix in tree hash1? */
> - if (!get_tree_entry_mode(r, hash1, shift_prefix, &sub1, &mode1) &&
> - S_ISDIR(mode1))
> + if (!get_tree_entry_mode(r, hash1, shift_prefix, &sub1, &tmp) &&
> + S_ISDIR(tmp))
> candidate |= 1;
>
> /* Can hash1 be a tree at shift_prefix in tree hash2? */
> - if (!get_tree_entry_mode(r, hash2, shift_prefix, &sub2, &mode2) &&
> - S_ISDIR(mode2))
> + if (!get_tree_entry_mode(r, hash2, shift_prefix, &sub2, &tmp) &&
> + S_ISDIR(tmp))
> candidate |= 2;
>
> if (candidate == 3) {
> --
> 2.31.0.rc2.211.g1d0b8788b3
>
