Re: [RFC] remarks about custom diff driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:36:34PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:

> Indeed, what I would have needed is a custum text converter. In my
> case, I would have said something like
> 
> [...]
>
> Any opinion? Do you think that's overkill? Anyone else have a
> particuliar experience with custom diff engine?

Interestingly enough, I tried using a custom diff for the first time
earlier today and came to the exact same conclusion (I was diff'ing
photos that were tagged with exif keywords). I suspect a large number of
diff engines will simply want to convert content into a canonical text
format.

I wonder if you could simply use a "diff-filter" attribute that would
clean and smudge in the same way as "filter", except it would only do so
when creating or applying diffs. In most cases, you wouldn't have a
"clean" component (since the conversion to text is lossy).

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux