Ephrim Khong <dr.khong@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I do not think we mind fixing the use of O_TRUNC with "remove and >> then create with O_EXCL", but we'd probably want to >> >> * understand why only this place matters, or perhaps other uses of >> O_TRUNC needs the same fix to work "correctly" with your NFS >> mounts, in which case we'd need all of them addressed in the same >> series of patches, and > > I'd say that is up to you. Personally I'd rather err on the side of > caution and leave the other code as is, especially since it is not > really required for the file mode issue as described above. OK. Especially the other places are prepared to deal with a leftover stale file, there is no reason to add extra cost to unlink before recreating. If we know this place we will never have an existing file (because we unlinked), then TRUNC -> EXCL is a no-cost change for us. If some of these other places turn out to be problem for you and other users who are affected by the same NFS mount problem, we may need to replace these places' open(CREAT|TRUNC) with a wrapper that conditionally does an unlink+open(CREAT|EXCL) with a Makefile knob. But before doing any of that, we'd need to see ... >> * understand why your NFS mount is broken and give a better >> explanation as to why we need to have a workaround in our code. > > I'll work on this, but unfortunately have no idea of how to properly > debug it. Since it is a company server without administrative rights and > the backend is some IBM storage system, the options are limited and > processes are slow. What I did find out so far is that it is not a race > condition with unlink. A simple openat() without O_EXCL already produces > the wrong file mode. ... this resolved, I would think. Thanks.
