Hi, On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Jeff King wrote: > On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 05:38:22PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > The old code _should_ have worked; it is more likely that your > > different metric just hides the bug. The old metric tried to favour > > less merge traversals over more traversals, but at the same time, it > > favoured smaller numbers over larger ones (but as you found out, only > > in the last component). > > Right, the problem is that we have effectively _thrown away_ the > "smaller numbers over larger ones" information for components other than > the last. You're right. I misremembered name-rev to use a fifo instead of stupid recursion. Will fix. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
