On Aug 27, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi, On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Dan Chokola wrote:On 8/26/07, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:55. Would commerical (paid) support from a support vendor be of interest to you/your organization? Only 44 answers yes, 217 no, 126 not applicable (which was menat to encompass people who do not use git for work).Are questions like this at all indicative of where Git is looking towards going?No. These questions are just questions. Git is GPLv2, and it will probably stay that forever, so you are _free_ to start a commercial support scheme for Git, but others are free not to choose it.I for one could imagine training people, and giving technical support forcompanies needing that support.
You seem to imply that GPLv3 would prevent any form of commercial support for Git...
Section 4 of GPLv3: "you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee." -- Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna EPITA Research and Development Laboratory
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part