Re: [PATCH 0/3] sha256 fixes for filter-branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021-03-10 at 17:06:33, Jeff King wrote:
> It actually does get covered. Dropping that case-arm means we'll fall
> through to the one below, which does _roughly_ the same thing with a
> bunch of extra warnings. But none of the tests actually check the error
> messages, so they don't notice.
> 
> Here's a series which fixes it, plus extra tests to notice the
> distinction.
> 
>   [1/3]: t7003: test ref rewriting explicitly
>   [2/3]: filter-branch: drop multiple-ancestor warning
>   [3/3]: filter-branch: drop $_x40 glob

This series looked good to me.  Thanks for sending it.
-- 
brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them)
Houston, Texas, US

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux