Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > parallelized" I could write: > > Hooks executed during prepare-commit-msg will not be parallelized, > because the file provided in the first argument is expected to be edited > by each hook. Yeah. It's been quite a while since I wrote the message you are responding to, and it took me a while to get the context back in my head, but the above looks reasonable to me. We could tweak it a bit to say "the file ... serves as an input to be modified in place by each hook" to make it even clearer, but I think yours is clear enough. Thanks.
