Re: [PATCH v6 00/39] SHA-256, part 3/3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 08:36:15AM -0800, Elijah Newren wrote:

> Honestly not sure it's worth bothering fixing filter-branch at this
> point, given the strong WARNINGs we added to it.  If anything, I'd
> just add another warning to the pile for this issue.  If folks really
> still want/need filter-branch once SHA-256 is the only option, I'm
> sure they'll be motivated to make the necessary fixes (or just use/fix
> filter-repo's filter-branch-ish).

You're probably right that it's not a good use of time, but I just sent
a series fixing it. It was one of those cases where I was like "oh, it's
probably just X". And then "no, wait...", and before I knew it I had
wasted an hour fixing filter-branch. ;)

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux