Re: [PATCH v6 16/21] mingw: try to work around issues with the test cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 29 2019, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:

> From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
>
> It seems that every once in a while in the Git for Windows SDK, there
> are some transient file locking issues preventing the test clean up to
> delete the trash directory. Let's be gentle and try again five seconds
> later, and only error out if it still fails the second time.
>
> This change helps Windows, and does not hurt any other platform
> (normally, it is highly unlikely that said deletion fails, and if it
> does, normally it will fail again even 5 seconds later).
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  t/test-lib.sh | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
> index f31a1c8f79..9c0ca5effb 100644
> --- a/t/test-lib.sh
> +++ b/t/test-lib.sh
> @@ -1104,7 +1104,11 @@ test_done () {
>  			error "Tests passed but trash directory already removed before test cleanup; aborting"
>  
>  			cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/.." &&
> -			rm -fr "$TRASH_DIRECTORY" ||
> +			rm -fr "$TRASH_DIRECTORY" || {
> +				# try again in a bit
> +				sleep 5;
> +				rm -fr "$TRASH_DIRECTORY"
> +			} ||
>  			error "Tests passed but test cleanup failed; aborting"
>  		fi
>  		test_at_end_hook_

I saw this sleep while reading some test-lib.sh code, doesn't this break
df4c0d1a79 (test-lib: abort when can't remove trash directory,
2017-04-20) for non-Windows platforms?

Your CL for v3 suggests this was only encountered in Azure VMs:
https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.31.v3.git.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/

Aside from this obscure issue, wouldn't it make more sense to have some
optional "I'm under CI" flag to skip the teardown one test at a time as
we're probably about to shut off the transitory VM soon?

I skip some tests, but the test suite creates ~950MB of trash for
me. Maybe cheaper for some to just keep that around and have it all
removed at the end.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux