Taylor Blau <ttaylorr@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2021年3月9日周二 上午4:18写道： > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 06:57:19AM +0000, ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget wrote: > > From: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > In https://lore.kernel.org/git/YBx5rmVsg1LJhSKN@nand.local/, > > Taylor Blau proposing 'git format-patch --cover-letter > > --range-diff' may mistakenly place upstream commit in the > > range-diff output. Teach `format-patch` pass `--right-only` > > to range-diff, maybe can avoid this kind of mistake. > > > > Because `git rebase --apply` will internally call `git > > format-patch -k --stdout --full-index --cherry-pick --right-only > > --src-prefix=a/ --dst-prefix=b/ --no-renames --no-cover-letter > > --pretty=mboxrd --topo-order --no-base`, In order to avoid the > > ambiguity of `--right-only`, users can call `format-patch > > --range-diff --only-right` instead of `--right-only` to only emit > > output related to the second range. > > A couple of times this new option is called "--right-only" and other > times it is "--only-right". This comment makes me think that you meant > to call it "--only-right", but... > > > Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > [GSOC][RFC] format-patch: pass --right-only to range-diff > > > > Transfer parameters are relatively simple. But because I can' t > > reproduce the situation, There's no big difference between adding > > ---only-right and not adding ---only-right. So I haven't written the > > test files for the time being. > > Note that I think (and Johannes--cc'd--could confirm) that what you want > is '--left-only' to discard rebased changes from the upstream branch: > > In either case, this should help you reproduce it (and would be a good > starting point for adding a test case). Here, we're using '--left-only' > to discard changes from upstream (here, the 'main' branch) after > rebasing: > > #!/bin/sh > > set -e > > rm -fr repo > git init repo > cd repo > > git branch -M main > > echo "base" >base > git add base > git commit -m "base" > > git checkout -b my-feature > echo "feature" >feature > git add feature > git commit -m "feature" > > base="$(git rev-parse main)" > old="$(git rev-parse my-feature)" > > git checkout main > echo "other" >>base > git add base > git commit -m "new" > > git checkout my-feature > git rebase $base --onto main > > tip="$(git rev-parse my-feature)" > > git range-diff $base $old $tip > git range-diff --left-only $base $old $tip > Thanks, I have seen an obvious phenomenon from your shell script, and I wrote test code based on it. > > I may need to ask reviewers opinion first. > > > > this want to fix #876 Thanks. > > > > Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-898%2Fadlternative%2Fformat-patch-range-diff-right-only-v1 > > Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-898/adlternative/format-patch-range-diff-right-only-v1 > > Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/898 > > > > Documentation/git-format-patch.txt | 5 ++++- > > builtin/log.c | 15 ++++++++++----- > > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-format-patch.txt b/Documentation/git-format-patch.txt > > index 3e49bf221087..5dae34c3090b 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/git-format-patch.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/git-format-patch.txt > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ SYNOPSIS > > [--[no-]encode-email-headers] > > [--no-notes | --notes[=<ref>]] > > [--interdiff=<previous>] > > - [--range-diff=<previous> [--creation-factor=<percent>]] > > + [--range-diff=<previous> [--creation-factor=<percent>] [--right-only]] > > [--filename-max-length=<n>] > > [--progress] > > [<common diff options>] > > @@ -301,6 +301,9 @@ material (this may change in the future). > > creation/deletion cost fudge factor. See linkgit:git-range-diff[1]) > > for details. > > > > +--only-right: > > + Used with `--range-diff`, only emit output related to the second range. > > + > > s/--only-right/--right-only? Now it's all "--left-only". > > > --notes[=<ref>]:: > > --no-notes:: > > Append the notes (see linkgit:git-notes[1]) for the commit > > diff --git a/builtin/log.c b/builtin/log.c > > index f67b67d80ed1..5d2f39fd19a7 100644 > > --- a/builtin/log.c > > +++ b/builtin/log.c > > @@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ static void make_cover_letter(struct rev_info *rev, int use_separate_file, > > struct commit *origin, > > int nr, struct commit **list, > > const char *branch_name, > > - int quiet) > > + int quiet, int right_only) > > { > > const char *committer; > > struct shortlog log; > > @@ -1228,7 +1228,8 @@ static void make_cover_letter(struct rev_info *rev, int use_separate_file, > > .creation_factor = rev->creation_factor, > > .dual_color = 1, > > .diffopt = &opts, > > - .other_arg = &other_arg > > + .other_arg = &other_arg, > > + .right_only = right_only > > }; > > > > diff_setup(&opts); > > @@ -1732,7 +1733,7 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > > struct strbuf rdiff2 = STRBUF_INIT; > > struct strbuf rdiff_title = STRBUF_INIT; > > int creation_factor = -1; > > - > > + int right_only = 0; > > Nit: the newline between creation_factor's declaration and > builtin_format_patch_options's is good to keep. > > > const struct option builtin_format_patch_options[] = { > > OPT_CALLBACK_F('n', "numbered", &numbered, NULL, > > N_("use [PATCH n/m] even with a single patch"), > > @@ -1814,6 +1815,8 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > > parse_opt_object_name), > > OPT_STRING(0, "range-diff", &rdiff_prev, N_("refspec"), > > N_("show changes against <refspec> in cover letter or single patch")), > > + OPT_BOOL(0, "only-right", &right_only, > > + N_("only emit output related to the second range")), > > OPT_INTEGER(0, "creation-factor", &creation_factor, > > N_("percentage by which creation is weighted")), > > OPT_END() > > @@ -2087,7 +2090,8 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > > creation_factor = RANGE_DIFF_CREATION_FACTOR_DEFAULT; > > else if (!rdiff_prev) > > die(_("--creation-factor requires --range-diff")); > > - > > + if (right_only && !rdiff_prev) > > + die(_("--right_only requires --range-diff")); > > These may be good to combine into one big conditional that dies whenever > an option requiring --range-diff is set, but --range-diff is not: > Good tip. > if (!rdiff_prev) { > if (creation_factor) > die(_("--creation-factor requires --range-diff")); > if (right_only) > die(_("--right-only requires --range-diff")); > } > > Thanks, > Taylor Thanks, ZheNing Hu
