Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I dunno how involved the necessary surgery would be, though. If >> this is easy to work around, perhaps it might be a better option for >> the overall project to ship the upcoming release with this listed as >> a known breakage. > > I don't think it's too difficult - I think we'll only need to filter out > the --pack_header when we figure out the arguments to pass for the > packfiles given by URI. I'll take a look. What you sent earlier is a much better band-aid than "keep the single args array but filter an element out in only one codepath" band-aid, I would think. Any change that is more involved than a single-liner trivial bugfix would be too late for this cycle, as we'd be cutting -rc2 by the end of tomorrow. Thanks.
