Am 06.03.21 um 18:27 schrieb Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason: > Do these sorts of rules really benefit that much from the type > v.s. expression? If yes we'll obviously need to support it, but if (and > I haven't looked closely) we can equally rewrite them with "expression" > (or it would be good enough) we could be quite a bit faster by > default... Type information is essential for many (most?) semantic patches. Untyped replacements could be done more easily using sed or similar. René
