Change the behavior of the .gitmodules validation added in
5476e1efde (fetch-pack: print and use dangling .gitmodules,
2021-02-22) so we're using one "fsck_options".
I found that code confusing to read. One might think that not setting
up the error_func earlier means that we're relying on the "error_func"
not being set in some code in between the two hunks being modified
here.
But we're not, all we're doing in the rest of "cmd_index_pack()" is
further setup by calling fsck_set_msg_types(), and assigning to
do_fsck_object.
So there was no reason in 5476e1efde to make a shallow copy of the
fsck_options struct before setting error_func. Let's just do this
setup at the top of the function, along with the "walk" assignment.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
---
builtin/index-pack.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/index-pack.c b/builtin/index-pack.c
index 2b2266a4b7d..5ad80b85b47 100644
--- a/builtin/index-pack.c
+++ b/builtin/index-pack.c
@@ -1761,6 +1761,7 @@ int cmd_index_pack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
read_replace_refs = 0;
fsck_options.walk = mark_link;
+ fsck_options.error_func = print_dangling_gitmodules;
reset_pack_idx_option(&opts);
git_config(git_index_pack_config, &opts);
@@ -1951,13 +1952,8 @@ int cmd_index_pack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
else
close(input_fd);
- if (do_fsck_object) {
- struct fsck_options fo = fsck_options;
-
- fo.error_func = print_dangling_gitmodules;
- if (fsck_finish(&fo))
- die(_("fsck error in pack objects"));
- }
+ if (do_fsck_object && fsck_finish(&fsck_options))
+ die(_("fsck error in pack objects"));
free(objects);
strbuf_release(&index_name_buf);
--
2.31.0.rc0.126.g04f22c5b82
