Jeff Hostetler <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 3/3/21 2:38 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> I agree with both of you that the code is unnice in its stack usage >> and we want fix with malloc(), or something like that, but sorry, I >> think I merged this round by mistake to 'next'. >> As we won't be merging the topic to the upcoming release anyway, I >> am willing to revert the merge to 'next' and requeue an updated one, >> when it appears (I am also OK to see an incremental update, "oops, >> no, we realize we don't want to have it on the stack" fix-up, if >> this is the only glitch in the series that need to be fixed). > > I'm preparing a follow-on patch series to address Peff's comments > from Friday/Monday and yours from yesterday. I thought I'd send > it as a set of new changes to sit on top of what we have in "next" > if that would make things easier for you. Yeah, that is OK, too. Sorry for the mistake of merging it too early.
