Re: bug: conflicting core.bare setting causes segfault during bare clone

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I will admit being a bit interested in how this was discovered, since it
> seems like an odd configuration to have, so if you can share, I'd
> appreciate it, if only to satisfy my curiosity.

I had the same reaction.  Forcing everything to be bare is quite
unusual.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux