Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hmm, I see. I didn't follow whatever discussion led to the decision to > use this sort of prefix matching, but I have to wonder if it is a good > idea. Meaning --fixup=a:<commit> and --fixup=amend:<commit> do the same thing, until somebody invents --fixup=another:<commit> and makes the prefix 'a' no longer unique? I tend to agree that, especially with command line completion support with modern shells, such a prefix matching would not be necessary. > Was the idea that it behave similarly to sequencer commands in > `git rebase --interactive` which are often abbreviated to a single > letter? I personally would feel much more comfortable requiring a > full-word match for `amend` and `reword` at initial implementation. Me too.
