Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 07:48:23AM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > >> I am beginning to wonder if just opening them all with O_NOFOLLOW (and a >> hacky 2-syscall fallback for portability) might be less ugly than all of >> this. > > So here's what that series might look like. It would replace all of this > verify_path() stuff entirely (and fsck, though we might want to add > detection to fsck just as an informational thing). It gives similar > protections, and would similarly force people using an in-tree symlink > to stop doing that. But it makes it much less of a pain to do so, > because they can still check out, etc; the symlinks just won't be > followed. > > I think we could even use the same technique to roll back the > restrictions on .gitmodules being a symlink. That one makes me a bit > more nervous, just because we also write it. I _think_ that might be > safe, because we only do so using a temp file and rename(), which should > replace the symlink. > > [1/6]: add open_nofollow() helper > [2/6]: attr: convert "macro_ok" into a flags field > [3/6]: exclude: add flags parameter to add_patterns() > [4/6]: attr: do not respect symlinks for in-tree .gitattributes > [5/6]: exclude: do not respect symlinks for in-tree .gitignore > [6/6]: mailmap: do not respect symlinks for in-tree .mailmap > > attr.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > builtin/sparse-checkout.c | 8 +++--- > dir.c | 21 ++++++++++---- > dir.h | 3 +- > git-compat-util.h | 7 +++++ > mailmap.c | 22 ++++++++++---- > t/t0003-attributes.sh | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++-- > t/t0008-ignores.sh | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > t/t4203-mailmap.sh | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++ > wrapper.c | 16 +++++++++++ > 10 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) So, I've read these changes and they all looked quite reasonable. Where do we want to go from here? Merge it down and forget about the changes in verify_path() and fsck in the jk/symlinked-dotgitx-files topic? Do we want to also cover the .gitmodules file with the same mechansim? Thanks.