On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 1:21 PM Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > When we write `<name>`s with the "s" tucked on to the closing backtick, > we end up rendering the backticks literally. Rephrase this sentence > slightly to render this as monospace. That seems fine, but one question (diff trimmed way down to make it clearer I hope): > + contain an equals sign to avoid ambiguity with <name> containing > + to avoid ambiguity with `<name>` containing one. One replacement drops the backquotes entirely. The other keeps them. Surely these two shouldn't be *different*...? Chris
