On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:02:24PM +0000, janek wrote: > What did you do before the bug happened? (Steps to reproduce your issue) > git status --short --show-stash --branch > > What did you expect to happen? (Expected behavior) > The status shows info about the stash, e.g. next to the branch infos > > What happened instead? (Actual behavior) > --show-stash is ignored when using short format Hmm. It's certainly possible to do something like: diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c index 0c8287a023..397d36544d 100644 --- a/wt-status.c +++ b/wt-status.c @@ -2013,6 +2013,9 @@ static void wt_shortstatus_print(struct wt_status *s) for_each_string_list_item(it, &s->ignored) wt_shortstatus_other(it, s, "!!"); + + if (s->show_stash) + wt_longstatus_print_stash_summary(s); } static void wt_porcelain_print(struct wt_status *s) and that would cause 'git status' to do what you expect: $ git.compile status --short --branch --show-stash ## tb/empty-trailer-continuation M wt-status.c Your stash currently has 16 entries But it may not be the right thing to do, since that explicitly breaks the --porcelain format. We may want something like this in addition to the above: diff --git a/builtin/commit.c b/builtin/commit.c index 739110c5a7..ef855896a2 100644 --- a/builtin/commit.c +++ b/builtin/commit.c @@ -1414,6 +1414,12 @@ int cmd_status(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) s.show_untracked_files == SHOW_NO_UNTRACKED_FILES) die(_("Unsupported combination of ignored and untracked-files arguments")); + if (status_format == STATUS_FORMAT_PORCELAIN || + status_format == STATUS_FORMAT_PORCELAIN_V2) { + if (s.show_stash) + die(_("--porcelain is incompatible with --show-stash")); + } + parse_pathspec(&s.pathspec, 0, PATHSPEC_PREFER_FULL, prefix, argv); Thanks, Taylor