Re: [PATCH 1/6] add open_nofollow() helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:07:39AM -0500, Taylor Blau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:02:23AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> > Can you double-check your initial timings?
>
> Aha, I forgot to update the input to the second check-attr tests after
> putting .gitattributes files everywhere.
>
> Rerunning with O_NOFOLLOW, the initial timings look something like
> 128.8ms and 183.7ms before/after.

I should add that "before" refers to a clean checkout, and "after"
refers to the state after running 'find * -type d | ... | xargs touch'.
Both of those numbers are with the O_NOFOLLOW branch.

If I repeat the test after applying:

diff --git a/wrapper.c b/wrapper.c
index 563ad590df..90f603e749 100644
--- a/wrapper.c
+++ b/wrapper.c
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ int is_empty_or_missing_file(const char *filename)

 int open_nofollow(const char *path, int flags)
 {
-#ifdef O_NOFOLLOW
+#if 0
        return open(path, flags | O_NOFOLLOW);
 #else
        struct stat st;

Then those numbers go from 155.9ms to 197.2ms.

Thanks,
Taylor



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux